Europe Blog

Our views on the Internet and society

Greater choice for wireless access point owners

Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Share on Google+ Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google
Labels: Google in Europe Blog , privacy

14 comments :

  1. Stuart LewisNovember 15, 2011 at 8:19 AM

    Wouldn't it be fairer to have an opt-in policy, rather than requiring many people to change their SSIDS? I suspect a large number of wifi router owners don't read announcements such as this, or know how to update their network names.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. SørenNovember 15, 2011 at 10:57 AM

    May I suggest that you change this to an optin procedure? So if I wanted to be added to your location database (or any other location database) I would add "_NoPrivacy" to my SSID

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. dutchmanNovember 15, 2011 at 2:36 PM

    I find it ridiculous that Google is forcing people to rename their SSID's. Maybe Google would also like to start tracking people some day.. Using a similar technique, I suppose you could opt out by wearing a big ugly hat that says "OPT OUT" on it.

    I think that unless this policy is changed, Google needs to seriously consider finding a new tag line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. AnonymousNovember 15, 2011 at 4:33 PM

    Why not make it "_yesmap" instead of "_nomap". Thus changing it from active opt-out to active opt-in.

    Most normal user do not know how to change the SSID or what it means.
    I do not want to create a ugly SSID because Google demands it if i do not want my Wireless Network to be mapped.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. PlaciplóstilusNovember 15, 2011 at 8:45 PM

    Are you kidding me? So, If I don want you to use my Wireless I have to change it? Shouldn`t you ask the people if they want to help you? Maybe people should add "_yesmap" to their wireless?

    Buuuuuuuuuuuhhh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. MarcoNovember 15, 2011 at 10:02 PM

    "we can do more to address privacy concerns": yes, make the service opt-in!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Alx KliveNovember 16, 2011 at 6:23 AM

    This policy seems poorly implemented at best.

    Google had an opportunity here to do something truly innovative and progressive. Adding a '_nomap' tag to an SSID is borderline insulting to people, and if the 98% of people who don't know what it means, did know what it meant (and could actually do it), there would surely be an uproar.

    Google could have set a much better example compared to competitors (who I accept are doing the same core thing) by releasing a dedicated Privacy app, allowing users to opt out of the Google Location service simply, without needing to change their SSID, and could go further to allow other private data to be viewed and controlled easily. This would be progressive.

    I appreciate that it's a competitive marketplace and there must have been internal debate over this, but this approach reeks of sleaziness, and was unnecessary in this case.

    Privacy issues will explode in people's mindsets at some point. This can potentially be avoided by being ahead of the curve and putting all privacy readily in the control of the user.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. wijnandsNovember 16, 2011 at 7:34 AM

    So..

    You're making us jump trough hoops because you can't be bothered to respect our privacy?

    I think more than 75% of the average home user has no idea how to rename a network.
    A webpage where they could do the removal with a few mouse clicks would have made a lot more sense.

    No Google, this is poor performance and right up there with snagging data and keeping it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. UnknownNovember 16, 2011 at 6:20 PM

    I would like to know what happens to users with hidden SSIDs. From what I've come to understand, your WiFi scanner collects the BSSIDs (MAC addresses) of access points it finds, which are obtainable even if the access point has a hidden SSID.

    So what happens if your find a BSSID which cannot resolve an SSID? Do you default to an opt-in, or do you default to an opt-out? I would hope that you opt-out by default if the SSID is hidden, but if not, I would still like to know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. cloudstarerNovember 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM

    Dear Sir,

    Your suggestion of adding "_nomap" to the SSID of WIFI networks that don't want to be included in Googles database has several flaws.

    Firstly, Google has already collected the data and mapped the locations of a large number of networks, is Google proposing to repeat this process to allow people to opt out of the scheme ?

    Secondly, not many private individuals have the necessary skill to change their SSID, in a large number of cases their WIFI routers either arrive pre configured, or are set up by a third party.

    Thirdly, the SSID is a fixed length field, adding "_nomap" may exceed this length for some.

    Fourthly, businesses and companies have naming standards are google proposing that they change their naming standards at Googles behest, will Google be recompensing them for this work ?

    I propose a better idea, don't collect WIFI data at all, as it's none of Google's business how many private WIFI networks are out there, any public access points can always submit their location for inclusion if they wish.

    It's a war drivers charter, even encrypted networks are vulnerable to intrusion these days and you are amassing a database of the location and name of every WIFI network.

    And you propose that we have to "opt out" rather than "opt in", probably because you are concerned that the "opt in" takeup won't be high enough to justify the cost of the scheme.

    I suppose a few million people and businesses having to change their WIFI settings as opposed to Google simply not collecting the data is the best solution for Google, I can assure you it is not.

    Speaking as a person running a business from home and the owner of an encrypted WIFI network, which I would rather people did not come and try to hack as I use it for company business and the information on it is confidential.

    I can state categorically that :-

    1 - I will not be changing any details of my network to make Googles life easier, I am not a Google employee, Google have no right to tell me what to do and it is arrogant of Google to assume that they can.

    and

    2 - If I find that my SSID has been included in some publicly accessible database that any war driving Tom, Dick or Harry can access or that my company data has been collected from my WIFI network without my explicit permission in writing, then Google will be hearing from my solicitors in very short order and I suspect this will not be the only case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. AnonymousNovember 23, 2011 at 3:49 PM

    If I'm not mistaken, my network's SSID is only broadcasted locally. If I would change my SSID like described in the 'help' (?) pages, my wireless access point will remain being used for location purposes until the next time a Google Street View car drives by and Google notices my SSID has changed. IMHO this is not even opt-out, as it can take many years before Google starts reindexing for Street View. This is no solution, this is only an effort to to change the public's (and politic's) opinion regarding the illegal way of gathering location data. Google and respecting privacy apparently do not match.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. cloudstarerNovember 25, 2011 at 12:16 PM

    I see

    Comments threatening legal action don't get published.

    You'd better remove the one that I posted on the help centre article at the same time I posted here then.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. cloudstarerNovember 26, 2011 at 9:52 AM

    So the world should jump through googles hoop so google can make even more profit by using the data it already gathered without bothering to inform anyone or ask permission first ?

    No, I'm not changing anything at googles behest, I get no benefit from this whatsoever.

    And if my company network is used for any purpose without my explicit written permission or if my private company data appears anywhere on the web then the persons responsible will be hearing from my solicitors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. AnonymousNovember 27, 2011 at 12:04 PM

    This should be an opt-in feature, not opt-out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

You are welcome to comment here, but your remarks should be relevant to the conversation. To keep the exchanges focused and engaging, we reserve the right to remove off-topic comments, or self-promoting URLs and vacuous messages

  

Labels


  • Academics 18
  • Advertising 10
  • Africa 26
  • Austria 7
  • Belgium 25
  • Big Tent 11
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina 2
  • Browsers 1
  • Brussels Tech Talk 7
  • Bulgaria 5
  • Campus 2
  • Child Safety 24
  • Cloud computing 17
  • Competition 16
  • Computer Science 35
  • Computing Heritage 37
  • Consumers 11
  • controversial content 2
  • COP21 1
  • copyright 34
  • Crisis Response 2
  • Culture 116
  • Czech Republic 16
  • Data Centre 15
  • Denmark 4
  • Digital News Initiative 6
  • Digital Single Market 1
  • Diversity 7
  • Economic Impact of the Internet 57
  • Economy 24
  • Elections 7
  • Energy + Environment 16
  • Engineering 6
  • Environment 5
  • Estonia 6
  • European Commission 21
  • European Parliament 14
  • European Union 104
  • exhibitions 1
  • Finland 13
  • France 77
  • Free Expression 88
  • Free flow of information 47
  • German 1
  • Germany 65
  • Google for Entrepreneurs 9
  • Google in Europe Blog 846
  • Google Play 1
  • Google TechTalk 2
  • Google Translate 1
  • Google Trends 3
  • Google+ 4
  • Greece 16
  • Growth Engine 3
  • Hackathon 3
  • Hungary 16
  • Innovation 70
  • Internet Governance 7
  • IP 10
  • Ireland 16
  • Israel 17
  • Italy 42
  • Journalism 34
  • Latvia 1
  • Lithuania 1
  • Luxembourg 3
  • Maps 17
  • Middle East 18
  • Netherlands 6
  • News 2
  • News Lab 1
  • North Africa 6
  • Norway 3
  • online 1
  • Online Safety 2
  • Open data 8
  • Open Government 7
  • Open source 2
  • Poland 24
  • Portugal 6
  • Power of Data 25
  • privacy 49
  • Publishing 30
  • Right to be Forgotten 9
  • Rio+20 1
  • Romania 3
  • Russia 18
  • Safer Internet Day 4
  • San Marino 1
  • Science 5
  • Security 7
  • Single Market 7
  • Slovakia 16
  • Slovenia 2
  • SMEs 24
  • Spain 39
  • Startups 6
  • State of the Union 2
  • STEM Education 36
  • Street View 38
  • Surveillance 1
  • Sweden 13
  • Switzerland 11
  • Telecoms 11
  • The Netherlands 4
  • Tourism 1
  • Transparency 12
  • Tunisia 4
  • Turkey 3
  • Ukraine 3
  • United Kingdom 94
  • Vatican 2
  • Youth 2
  • YouTube 42


Archive


  •     2016
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb
    •     Jan
  •     2015
    •     Dec
    •     Nov
    •     Oct
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb
    •     Jan
  •     2014
    •     Dec
    •     Nov
    •     Oct
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb
    •     Jan
  •     2013
    •     Dec
    •     Nov
    •     Oct
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb
    •     Jan
  •     2012
    •     Dec
    •     Nov
    •     Oct
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb
    •     Jan
  •     2011
    •     Dec
    •     Nov
      • Magic moments in Egypt’s parliamentary elections, ...
      • Celebrating innovation in digital journalism
      • New frontiers in Lyon
      • DatenDialog - Big Tent goes to Berlin
      • Advocating Internet freedom at the European Parlia...
      • Street View comes to to the heart of the European ...
      • Joining Liberation in Lyon
      • Celebrating culture in Avignon
      • A new YouTube melody for European musicians
      • Celebrating LEO, the world’s first business computer
      • Greater choice for wireless access point owners
      • Boosting Italy's digital economy
      • Speaking out at the Brandenburg Gate
      • Hack4Transparency in the EU Parliament
      • Transparency team travels to Europe
      • Speaker's Corner celebrates fall of Berlin Wall
      • A thoughtful, constructive "cyberconference" in Lo...
      • Getting business online in Liverpool
    •     Oct
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb
    •     Jan
  •     2010
    •     Dec
    •     Nov
    •     Oct
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb
    •     Jan
  •     2009
    •     Dec
    •     Nov
    •     Oct
    •     Sep
    •     Aug
    •     Jul
    •     Jun
    •     May
    •     Apr
    •     Mar
    •     Feb

Feed

Give us feedback in our Product Forums.

Company-wide

  • Official Google Blog
  • Public Policy Blog
  • Student Blog

Products

  • Android Blog
  • Chrome Blog
  • Lat Long Blog

Developers

  • Developers Blog
  • Ads Developer Blog
  • Android Developers Blog
  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms